View the feedback we have received on the NTC Discussion Paper - Review of guidelines for trials of automated vehicles in Australia paper.

• File
  • 10) CEO to Miles - Submission to NTC.pdf
• Should the guidelines be updated to improve the management of trials (section 3 of the guidelines) and, if so, why?

  See submission letter

• Are there any additional criteria or additional matters relevant to the trials of automated heavy vehicles that should be included in the guidelines?

  See submission letter

• Are there any matters that the NTC should consider in its review of the guidelines?

  See submission letter

• Are there any other barriers to cross-border trials? Is there a need to change current arrangements for cross border trials?

  See submission letter

• Are there currently any regulatory or other barriers to running larger trials? If so, how should these barriers be addressed? (Consider the guidelines, state and territory exemption and permit schemes, and Commonwealth importation processes)

  See submission letter

• Is there anything further that should be done to facilitate a transition from trial to commercial deployment?

  See submission letter

• Is there any additional information the guidelines should include for trialling organisations?

  See submission letter

• Are the current insurance requirements sufficient (section 5 of the guidelines)? If not, how should they change?

  See submission letter

• Should there be a more standardised government evaluation framework for automated vehicle trials? If so, what are the trial issues that should be evaluated?

  See submission letter

• Should the guidelines apply to any other emerging technologies (discussed in chapter 4 or other technologies) and operating domains?

  See submission letter

• Should the guidelines be updated to improve the provision of relevant data and information (section 6 of the guidelines)?

  See submission letter

• Should the guidelines be updated to improve the safety management of trials (section 4 of the guidelines) and, if so, why?

  See submission letter

• Should the guidelines continue to allow commercial passenger services in automated vehicle trials? If so, should the guidelines reference additional criteria that trialling organisations should be subject to, and what should these criteria be?

  See submission letter

• Should the results of evaluations be shared between states and territories? If so, how should commercially sensitive information be treated?

  See submission letter

• What challenges have you faced with administrative processes when applying for approving trials of automated vehicles, and how could these be addressed?

  See submission letter

• What issues have been encountered when obtaining or providing insurance?

  See submission letter

• What works well in the automated vehicle importation process, and what are the challenges?

  See submission letter